Monday, December 17, 2012

Non-repectful disbelief!


    We should be respectful of most believers in woo,whether in the supernatural or the paranormal, what the late Paul Kurtz called " The Transcendental Temptation," a must read book. Nevertheless, the big-time purveyors like Billy Graham, haughty John Haught and Sylvia Brown[e] and Alexander van Praagh merit our derision and satire.
      Spinoza says to understand people, but be nice; Jefferson says to mock such fools!
      We  must have honest inquiry in both fields,but the evidence already mocks both! We need not examine every claim.
      We rationalists have the duty and the right to mock such twaddle. We reflect the need of society for educating others about such  emotional, intellectual and sometimes monetary scams. We partake in society; we are participants on the public square. Purveyors of woo also have the right to partake in society and in the public square; we seek only to overcome their seduction of others.
         What do you advise?

Reasonable Atheism: A Moral Case For Respectful Disbelief: Scott F. Aikin, Robert B. Talisse: 9781616143831: Amazon.com: Books

Reasonable Atheism: A Moral Case For Respectful Disbelief: Scott F. Aikin, Robert B. Talisse: 9781616143831: Amazon.com: Books

Monday, November 12, 2012

Debunking Christianity: On The Fundamental Objection to the OTF

Debunking Christianity: On The Fundamental Objection to the OTF

Free minds for that more abundant life!

 What do  you think  about what we should think freely in  religion and politics>
  I  think it's time to consider legalizing  prostitution and  consensual adult  incest. Laws already exist  against abuses.
    Now it's up to psychology to help people overcome their superstitons of the supernatural and the paranormal.
    We gnu atheists do have the right and - duty to e xpose religious  apologetics harshly.
    Supernaturalists and paranormalists ever rationalize their superstitions.
     Please  engage here  with your own inquiries.